翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Ozon.ru
・ Ozona Air Force Station
・ Ozona High School
・ Ozona, Florida
・ Ozona, Texas
・ Ozone
・ Ozone (album)
・ Ozone (American band)
・ Ozone (disambiguation)
・ Ozone (magazine)
・ Ozone (paddle steamer)
・ Ozone Action Day
・ Ozone Baby
・ Ozone cracking
・ Ozone depletion
Ozone depletion and climate change
・ Ozone depletion potential
・ Ozone Disco Club fire
・ Ozone Falls
・ Ozone Falls (disambiguation)
・ Ozone Falls State Natural Area
・ Ozone House
・ Ozone layer
・ Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite
・ Ozone monitor
・ Ozone Monitoring Instrument
・ Ozone Park (LIRR station)
・ Ozone Park Boys
・ Ozone Park – Lefferts Boulevard (IND Fulton Street Line)
・ Ozone Park, Queens


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Ozone depletion and climate change : ウィキペディア英語版
Ozone depletion and climate change
Ozone depletion and climate change, or Ozone hole and global warming in more popular terms, are environmental challenges whose connections have been explored and which have been compared and contrasted, for example in terms of global regulation, in various studies and books.
There is widespread scientific interest in better regulation of climate change, ozone depletion and air pollution, as in general the human relationship with the biosphere is deemed of major historiographical and political significance.〔(2010, Review ) of Joachim Radkau, ''Nature and Power: A Global History of the Environment'', ISBN 978-0521616737, by David Christian, 2010〕 Already by 1994 the legal debates about respective regulation regimes on climate change, ozone depletion and air pollution were being dubbed "monumental" and a combined synopsis provided.〔(Alexander Gillespie. Climate Change, Ozone Depletion And Air Pollution: Legal Commentaries Within The Context Of Science And Policy 1994 )〕
There are some parallels between atmospheric chemistry and anthropogenic emissions in the discussions which have taken place and the regulatory attempts which have been made. Most important is that the gases causing both problems have long lifetimes after emission to the atmosphere, thus causing problems which are difficult to reverse. However, the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer and the Montreal Protocol that amended it are seen as success stories, while the Kyoto Protocol on anthropogenic climate change has largely failed. Currently efforts are being undertaken to assess the reasons and to use synergies, for example with regard to data reporting and policy design and further exchanging of information.〔Sebastian Oberthür, International Environmental Agreements July 2001, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 357-377, Linkages between the Montreal and Kyoto Protocols – Enhancing Synergies between Protecting the Ozone Layer and the Global Climate〕 While the general public tends to see global warming as a subset of ozone depletion, in fact ozone and chemicals such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and other halocarbons, which are held responsible for ozone depletion, are important greenhouse gasses. Furthermore, natural levels of ozone in both the stratosphere and troposphere have a warming effect.
== Policy approach ==

There are both links and major differences between ozone depletion and global warming and the way the two challenges have been handled. While in the case of atmospheric ozone depletion, in a situation of high uncertainty and against strong resistance, climate change regulation attempts at the international level such as the Kyoto Protocol have failed to reduce global emissions.〔〔
The Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer and the Montreal Protocol were both originally signed by only some member states of the United Nations (43 nations in the case of the Montreal Protocol in 1986) while Kyoto attempted to create a world-wide agreement from scratch. Expert consensus concerning CFCs in the form of the Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion was reached long after the first regulatory steps were taken, and , all countries in the United Nations plus the Cook Islands, the Holy See, Niue and the supranational European Union had ratified the original Montreal Protocol.〔(【引用サイトリンク】title=EUROPA – PRESS RELEASES – Press Release – Environment: European Union hails universal ratification of the Montreal Protocol on protecting the ozone layer )〕 These countries have also ratified the London, Copenhagen, and Montreal amendments to the Protocol. , the Beijing amendments had not been ratified by two state parties.〔(【引用サイトリンク】title=Status of Ratification – The Ozone Secretariat )
After the Vienna Convention, the halocarbon industry shifted its position and started supporting a protocol to limit CFC production. US manufacturer DuPont acted more quickly than their European counterparts. The EU shifted its position as well after Germany, which has a substantial chemical industry, gave up its defence of the CFC industry〔 and started supporting more regulation. Government and industry in France and the UK had tried to defend their CFC-producing industries even after the Montreal Protocol had been signed.〔Reiner Grundmann, ''Transnational Environmental Policy'', London: Routledge, ISBN 0-415-22423-3〕
The Vienna Convention was installed before a scientific consensus on the ozone hole was established.〔Reiner Grundmann ("Technische Problemlösung, Verhandeln und umfassende Problemlösung", (Technical trouble shooting, negotiating and generic problem solving capability) ) in ''Gesellschaftliche Komplexität und kollektive Handlungsfähigkeit'' (Complexity of society and collective ability to act), ed. Schimank, U. (2000). Frankfurt/Main: Campus, pp. 154–82 (book summary ) at the Max Planck Gesellschaft〕 On the contrary, until the 1980s the EU, NASA, NAS, UNEP, WMO and the British government had issued scientific reports with divergent conclusions.〔 Sir Robert (Bob) Watson, Director of the Science Division at NASA, played a crucial role in the process of reaching a unified assessment.〔

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Ozone depletion and climate change」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.